Publisher: Interstate Commerce Commission / Publish Year Decade: 1920 - 1929 / Sudoc Stem: IC 1.13/1 - Blacklight Search Results

Start Over Publisher Interstate Commerce Commission Publish Year Decade 1920 - 1929 Sudoc Stem IC 1.13/1

1. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. Before Interstate Commerce Commission, docket no. 21012, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 1, [same] v. New York Central Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 2, [same] v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company; brief on behalf of Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:B 21/24

2. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. Before Interstate Commerce Commission, docket no. 21012, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 1, [same] v. New York Central Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 2, [same] v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company; brief on behalf of Interstate Commerce Commit sion.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:B 21/24

3. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. Before Interstate Commerce Commission, docket no. 21012, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 1, [same] v. New York Central Railroad Company; docket no. 21012, sub-no. 2, [same] v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company; reply brief on behalf of Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:B 21/26

4. Demurrage. No. 4793, in, Court of Appeals of District of Columbia, Apr. term, 1928, Bartlesville Zinc Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:B 284

5. Fertilizers. In equity, no. 8582, in district court for northern district of Illinois, eastern division, Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Company et al. v. United States, Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:Ak 73/7

6. Freight rates. No. 19, in Supreme Court, Oct. term, 1928, United States, Interstate Commerce Commission, and Fort Smith, Subiaco & Rock Island Railroad Company v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, appeal from district court for western district of Arkansas, Fort Smith division; supplemental brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:F 775/5

7. Freight rates. No. 607, in Supreme Court, Oct. term, 1927, United States, Interstate Commerce Commission, and Fort Smith, Subiaco & Rock Island Railroad Company v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, appeal from district court for western district of Arkansas, Fort Smith division; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:F 775/4

8. Grain. In equity, no 7687, in district court for northern district of Illinois, eastern division, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al. v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:At 2/25

9. Great Northern Railway. No. 612, in Supreme Court, Oct. term, 1927, Great Northern Railway Company v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appeal from district court for district of Minnesota; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:G 798

10. Piedmont and Northern Railway. In equity, no. 208, in district court for western district of South Carolina, Piedmont & Northern Railway Company v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; brief for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Publisher:: Interstate Commerce Commission
Date:: 1928
SuDoc number:: IC 1.13/1:P 595

« Previous
Next »
1 Current Page, Page 1
2
3
4
5
…
7
8