Author: Antitrust Division / Publish Year Decade: 1940 - 1949 - Blacklight Search Results

Start Over Author Antitrust Division Publish Year Decade 1940 - 1949

21. Electrical Solderless Service Connectors Institute. United States v. Electrical Solderless Service Connectors Institute et al. (U. S. D. C. S. D. New York—civ. no. 12-217), statement of grounds for action; consent decree.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:El 25

22. Food Distributors Association. United States v. Food Distributors Association et al. (U. S. D. C. Colorado—no. 9306), statement of grounds for action; indictment charging violation of Sherman antitrust law.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:F 739/2

23. Freihofer Baking Company. United States v. Freihofer Baking Company et al. (U. S. D. C. E. D. Pa.—no. 8847 criminal); [same] v. Freihofer Baking Company, Wm. Freihofer Baking Company, et al. (U. S. D. C. E. D. Pa.—no. 8848 criminal), statement of grounds for action; indictments charging violations of Sherman antitrust law.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:F 882

24. General Electric Company. United States v. General Electric Company et al. (U. S. D. N. J.—civ. no. 1364), statement of grounds for action: bill of complaint alleging violation of Federal antitrust laws.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:G 286/3

25. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company. United States v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company et al. (U. S. D. C. Dist. of Columbia—no. 67845), statement of grounds for action; indictment charging violation of Sherman antitrust law.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:G 798/2

26. Harbison-Walker Refractories Company. United States v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Company et al. (U. S. D. C., S. D. N. Y., no. 109-176), statement of grounds for action; imposition of fines.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:H 213

27. Harbor District Lumber Dealers Association. Civil action no. 1401-Y. in district court for southern district of California, central division. United States v. Harbor District Lumber Dealers Association et al.; complaint and consent decree.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: [1941.]
SuDoc number:: J 20.2:H 214

28. Ideal Cement Company. No. 9336 (criminal), in district court for district of Colorado, Nov. term, 1940, United States v. Ideal Cement Company et al.: indictment.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: [1941.]
SuDoc number:: J 20.8:Id 2

29. Ideal Cement Company. United States v. Ideal Cement Company et al.: [same] v. National Retail Lumber Dealers Association et al.; [same] v. Mountain States Lumber Dealers Association et al.; [same] v. W. C. Bell Services, Inc., et al. (U. S. D. C. Dist. Colo.—nos. 9336-39), statement of grounds for action; indictments charging violations of Sherman antitrust act.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:Id 2

30. Institute of Carpet Manufacturers of America, Inc. United States v. Institute of Carpet Manufacturers of America, Inc., et al. (U. S. D. C. s. D. N. Y.-civ. no. 12-416), statement of grounds for action; complaint and consent decree.

Corporate/Agency Authors:: Antitrust Division and Justice Department
Publisher:: Antitrust Division
Date:: 1941
SuDoc number:: J 20.7:In 7

« Previous
Next »
1
2
3 Current Page, Page 3
4
5
6
7